Yammer wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 11, 2025 10:47 am

when you noted "ZZ491" what type did you note

Doesn't know which day it was, what makes you think the type was noted?

DL wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 08, 2025 4:58 pm

Thanks Mark.

Does anyone else have any knowledge on this?

I do. It's different every year.

User joined on 8 May, posted 3 times on 8 May, and hasn't been back since. Not sure I'd be spending time writing complex replies here folks.

The best part about that decision is the 747-8 is even more restricted on where it can operate into and out of, so options on where it can land to refuel are much more limited.

Risk.

No, they turn them on and off fairly randomly - sometimes you'll see a lot, other times none of them have Mode-S OUT on.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=253477&p=1665639

TALON01 ZZ413
TALON02 ZZ535

What shortfall?

sdad wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:46 am

Are any even painted in RN colours?

No, they are all painted in “Lightning Force” markings. That’s kind of how a combined fleet works you see.

Chinese hypersonic missles? Wasn’t that a Sam Fender song?

The fact there is no "real" commitment to this by the Government is pitiful. This is merely lip service. Out of casual interest, what would you like to see by way of "real" commitment? I wouldn’t worry too much. Looking back at their posts it’s clear they’ve spent a little bit too long reading the ...

Looks like Draken did her a favour. Those curtains are horrendous.

No offence is intended in this reply, but I dont think answering that question publicly on an open forum is advisable. Yawnnnnnnnnnnn. Mods - seriously - can you act on people who are here simply to troll and try and stop people contributing? Meanwhile, I’ll go collate the answer from plenty of ope...

I wonder what legal basis the police have for issuing these letters. Be interesting to see what they'd do if someone challenged it.

Of course it was, even though it's not in any way connected to CW. Yet again the split sections meaning information is missed.

Wondered myself if it was having the “military upgrade” as both have started showing on Adsb military filter, but as others have posted, those upgrades are not scheduled yet! The military filter is a list of ICAO addresses created by the website owners. You could put quite literally anything in it,...

Snoop 95 wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:02 pm

Except for the concept that once one NATO member country is attacked the others are to render assistance. The USAF is only in the UK in support of NATO.

Best remind yourself how many times Article 5 has actually been invoked, and then by whom!

Holy crap

Wow! Thank you for sharing these, absolutely incredible!

Duty Officer...something? I can't remember what the C is.

No.

It is, however, somewhat amusing that you have decided it's Starmer that has put us in a perilous position, rather than Trump with his nonsense about invading Mexico, Canada and Greenland.