A valid question about Gannet v Dominie being inside was raised by 350biker, but where to start?
This was partially explained in the original NAM news release about the Dominie acquisition i.e.
“The acquisition of Dominie T1 XS726 is in line with one aim of the museum’s stated Collecting Policy of acquiring:
'Aircraft used in a training role.'
It also fills an important gap in the museum’s themed display of training aircraft. The type was used to teach the skills of systems management, air leadership, decision making and teamwork to various aircrew members including: weapon systems officers / operators, air engineers and air loadmasters."
Having been involved in making the decision I can explain the rationale even further.
It was viewed form a national perspective, using the NAHR (National Aviation Heritage Register) listings; this scheme is detailed and can be searched via this weblink
http://www.bapc.org.uk/html/nah_register.html
Even displayed inside NAM’s Gannet was only listed as Significant; mainly due to at least one AEW3 being displayed inside at a national collection. (There are 4 AEW.3’s listed).
At the time of the decision, there were no Dominies displayed undercover and the only one listed in a national museum is a later version of the Dominie. This move undercover will not only help preserve the type, but it should hopefully see XS726, which will retain its original configuration awarded National Benchmark status (the top listing possible).
A similar logic was used back in 2003 to help secure a major HLF (Heritage Lottery Fund) Grant, when designing Hangar 2 around moving the Varsity inside.
I have been looking round Hangar 2 this morning with a colleague, as NAM is looking at a major redevelopment of the area by the front of Hangar 2 to develop the training theme even further – watch for news about this in the New Year!
