Although not quite as old as the tankers the Herc was the pick of the bunch. 1505 started life with USAF in 1971 as 70-1276.
Those present were 57-1486 , 58-0079 , 58-0083 , 59-1448 , 59-1453 , 61-0321 , 00-0178 , 04-4137 and 1505

















Yeah, that's puzzling. I guess RAF Mildenhall had enough capacity to handle this?DanBeeden wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 4:39 amWow - quite the line up of USAF heavies. It always seems incredible to me that the USAF use Prestwick so heavily given the fees that must be associated with each movement. Just regular landing and handling fees, etc, for aircraft of this size. Given that they could land at actual USAF bases in the UK for a fraction of the cost? I must be missing something!!?
Thanks for sharing - I like the panoramic shot especially.
So whats the cost to land at a USAF base then if you are so confident it's cheaper than anywhere else?DanBeeden wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 4:39 amWow - quite the line up of USAF heavies. It always seems incredible to me that the USAF use Prestwick so heavily given the fees that must be associated with each movement. Just regular landing and handling fees, etc, for aircraft of this size. Given that they could land at actual USAF bases in the UK for a fraction of the cost? I must be missing something!!?
Thanks for sharing - I like the panoramic shot especially.
From the Heads Up section:
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], BobTog, paulbrown1665, R500sac and 91 guests