



NATO E-3 is also in, but not the special scheme we all wanted. As it's rumoured to be broke. Drat!

Cheers for the feedback Chris. The reason the watermark was the way it was originally shown was that in the last year or so, myself and Jack have seen a large amount of our images lifted and the watermark cropped out. Very frustrating as the people doing this should know better.Chris Procter wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 11:36 pmSome nice images .... pretty much ruined for the ridiculously OTT watermark... i am all for leaving a watermark on images but these are way too much - if your so concerned, post smaller lesser resolution images
Thank you for the kind words regarding the thread.Drinkmat wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:44 amVery nice images posted, and I'm all for the watermark as it is. Too many images are ripped off now, so I like seeing people protecting their work. If I see an image that I'd like to use (perhaps as a desktop background), I could always contact the photographer and ask.
Users browsing this forum: GreenBat, LIBERTY-48 and 42 guests