Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

UKAR seems U/S?

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
boff180
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 10:57 pm
Location: BHX
Contact:

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by boff180 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:53 am

Lots of stuff to moan about, like the prices in friat being higher than the showground. eg
Tea, 1.80 instead of 1.40
Coke, 2.00 instead of 1.80!

andy
Image

RichC

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by RichC » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:00 pm

I didn't go and i'll still moan about it!

Hurn
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:30 am

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by Hurn » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:56 pm

2e1var wrote:Still U/S !!! Shocking on one of the busiest show weekends of the year.
It's shocking when even the Vulcan seems more reliable than UKAR these days. :lol:

HighlandSniper

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by HighlandSniper » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:24 pm

Pardon me for asking, but why are we discussing rival forums here on FC?

pikey01

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by pikey01 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:01 pm

They are not rivals Rob, they cater for different markets...or so I'm told. But in answer to your question lots of FC members are also Ukar members so its not surprising questions pop up from time to time.

boff180
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 10:57 pm
Location: BHX
Contact:

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by boff180 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:51 pm

Also, if one website has got a problem, how are members going to know whats going on if the situation isn't discussed elsewhere?

Andy
Image

User avatar
MikeB
Administrator
Posts: 4654
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:37 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by MikeB » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:56 pm

boff180 wrote:Also, if one website has got a problem, how are members going to know whats going on if the situation isn't discussed elsewhere?

Andy
Yeah, in fairness, when FC went through troubles it was discussed on UKAR.

Mike

User avatar
Pen Pusher
Posts: 1970
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:58 pm
Location: St Ives, Cambs

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by Pen Pusher » Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:35 pm

And when it is up and running, it'll probably crash again as everyone will want to be the first to have their shot of a Raptor up :whistle:

Bria

User avatar
Mictheslik
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:21 pm

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by Mictheslik » Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm

Pen Pusher wrote:And when it is up and running, it'll probably crash again as everyone will want to be the first to have their shot of a Raptor up :whistle:

Bria
I got mine up about 20 minutes before it crashed on Friday night :P

.mic

User avatar
Pen Pusher
Posts: 1970
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:58 pm
Location: St Ives, Cambs

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by Pen Pusher » Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:57 pm

Mictheslik wrote:
Pen Pusher wrote:And when it is up and running, it'll probably crash again as everyone will want to be the first to have their shot of a Raptor up :whistle:

Bria
I got mine up about 20 minutes before it crashed on Friday night :P

.mic
So it was your fault then. :D

Brian

RichC

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by RichC » Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:36 pm

MikeB wrote:
boff180 wrote:Also, if one website has got a problem, how are members going to know whats going on if the situation isn't discussed elsewhere?

Andy
Yeah, in fairness, when FC went through troubles it was discussed on UKAR.

Mike
Yeah but quite often deleted !

Random

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by Random » Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:52 pm

But there's a difference between discussing forum politics and a simple server issue, Shirley?

nigelblake
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:57 am

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by nigelblake » Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:03 pm

boff180 wrote:Lots of stuff to moan about, like the prices in friat being higher than the showground. eg
Tea, 1.80 instead of 1.40
Coke, 2.00 instead of 1.80!

andy
I always take my own, 'cos its cheaper, and I know the tea is made just how I like it!

willow70
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:09 pm

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by willow70 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:09 am

I wonder if the ukar site going down was anything to do with someone posting the RIAT flying program for Saturday on there late Friday night.
Last edited by willow70 on Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Quixoticish

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by Quixoticish » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:35 pm

willow70 wrote:I wonder if the ukar site going down was anything to do with someone posting the RIAT flying program for Saturday on there late Saturday night.
Why would the site be down because someone posted the flying program after the display has taken place? :S

Hurn
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:30 am

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by Hurn » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:33 pm

Perhaps the sheer size and volume of the 'Red 4's got a big c*ck' thread has finally brought the UKAR server to it's knees.
They've been caught with their pants down and now they're struggling to get it back up again. :whistle:

pikey01

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by pikey01 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:55 pm

Hurn wrote:Perhaps the sheer size and volume of the 'Red 4's got a big c*ck' thread has finally brought the UKAR server to it's knees.
They've been caught with their pants down and now they're struggling to get it back up again. :whistle:
Clearly the team were made aware of that particular thread....it was...hinted at in the commentary during their display - both days :lol:

itfcscott
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:22 pm

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by itfcscott » Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:03 pm

pikey01 wrote:
Hurn wrote:Perhaps the sheer size and volume of the 'Red 4's got a big c*ck' thread has finally brought the UKAR server to it's knees.
They've been caught with their pants down and now they're struggling to get it back up again. :whistle:
Clearly the team were made aware of that particular thread....it was...hinted at in the commentary during their display - both days :lol:
It has actually been part of the commentry over the last 2 years rather than a more recent addition.

pikey01

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by pikey01 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:07 pm

itfcscott wrote:
pikey01 wrote:
Hurn wrote:Perhaps the sheer size and volume of the 'Red 4's got a big c*ck' thread has finally brought the UKAR server to it's knees.
They've been caught with their pants down and now they're struggling to get it back up again. :whistle:
Clearly the team were made aware of that particular thread....it was...hinted at in the commentary during their display - both days :lol:
It has actually been part of the commentry over the last 2 years rather than a more recent addition.
I was Reffering to Red10 saying it would have to stay secret and not apporiate to say why he was called horse over the weekend. At Biggin he pretty much said it was because of his large johnson :D

itfcscott
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:22 pm

Re: UKAR seems U/S?

Post by itfcscott » Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:33 pm

Ok mate, sorry understood your post wrong. :D

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests