Wickenby wings and wheels 2011, help please.

[jakdaw]

went to wickenby last weekend and saw lots of military/psuedo miltary aircraft in the open vintage skunk works hangar some of the aircraft carried false or incorrect serials and some didnt carry anything anyone manage to get a better log than me as to what was in there. tried over on cival avation but i seems maybe i was the only spotter there please help. would have asked on the day but the only people about where well in the hangar.

[GOOSE]

jakdaw, see pm.

[jakdaw]

thanks goose really thought i was the only FCer that had gone.

[POL]

All of the following (Via Eurodemobbed) should be at Wickenby;


C-558 EKW C3605 58, G-CCYZ, ex SwiAF Private Jun 2009
FT118 NA Harvard IIIB 43-12859, G-BZHL Private
MW401 Hawker Tempest II G-PEST, HA604 Private Apr 2006
MW763 Hawker Tempest II HF-, G-TEMT Private Jun 2009
N6537 DH Tiger Moth II G-AOHY Private Jun 2009
N6720 DH Tiger Moth II G-BYTN, VX Private May 2009
TW501 Auster AOP5 G-ALBJ Private Jun 2009
WB697 DHC Chipmunk T10 95, G-BXCT Private May 2009
WD390 DHC Chipmunk T10 68, G-BWNK Private Jun 2009
97+04 Elster B G-APVF, ex WGAF Private Jun 2009
354 Morane Saulnier MS.315 E G-BZNK, ex AdlA Private Jun 2009
963 PZL SZD-9 bis Ex AREAF Stored Jun 2009
1870710 Ilyushin Il-2 G-BZVW, ex SovAF On Rebuild Sept 2006
1878576 Ilyushin Il-2 G-BZVX, ex SovAF Stored Sept 2006


What do you think you saw, then we can work on tying it up

[jakdaw]

Thanks Chrisglobe but the PM from goose was a list of what was there on the day, to be fair the vintage skunk work hangar was full of bits and pieces some just frames on wheels some less. Unless someone had a list from the day they could have been anything, although that is a interesting bunch to be rebuilding. Thanks again though.

[POL]

Any chance of that list being posted here then, so the rest of us know what may or may not be in said hangar?

[GOOSE]

The list was not my own and I have not yet received the originator's ok to post it. Why the rolling eyes smilie anyway? A civil question would have sufficed.