Machloop wrote:how about transferring the money to a Harrier or Tornado project ?

Machloop wrote:how about transferring the money to a Harrier or Tornado project ?
I agree, she costs a lot but its worth it every time she roars into the sky, I'd love to see lots of other aircraft back in the air too, but in these times of a poor economy it isn't going to happen. While we have a flyable Vulcan we should cherish it!GVLCN wrote:Am I the only one who will be disappointed to not see her on the airshow circuit next year? Seems most people haven't got anything better to do than moan. With ever decreasing airshow participation form all corners of the globe, with a star like the vulcan gone next year it will just another nail in the coffin for uk airshows and it'll be the same people moaning about how XH558 Won't be flying and how another one bites the dust.
Nice to see such an intelligent thread started on fighter control,,, NOT
No you're not. I'm sure many of us will be sorry to see the end of the Vulcan displays.GVLCN wrote:Am I the only one who will be disappointed to not see her on the airshow circuit next year?
The problem with threads like this is that people seem to think it's simply a matter of channelling funding from the Vulcan to another project. Even one as daft as a Harrier or Tornado.GVLCN wrote:Nice to see such an intelligent thread started on fighter control,,, NOT
Well yes it's begging and it's frowned upon by some, but VttS do what they have to do to get the money in, and ultimately have given us a flying Vulcan for the last five years which is pretty amazing.RJ79 wrote:I can see both schools of thought on this, yes it will be extremely sad to see the old girl finally go but I won't miss the weekly e-mail saying we haven't hit this or that target (not too far removed from begging).
I think there's stricter limits on the aircraft today, but I'd definitely like more noise from the display. If there's one criticism I've had over the past few years it's that we've never had that earth shattering roar we know it's capable of and for me the display needs revamping.RJ79 wrote:What would be nice, if this is the last year, would be to really push her to the limits that were last seen around 1993 (whether that would be allowed is another thing0.
Ooh Burrrn!CH2 wrote:Are you Dan O'Hagan?
Machloop wrote:XH-558 has been on its last legs for years but now is the time to let her go. It costs more to run than a small principality and lets face it, the public don't give a monkey's. Time to think smaller so how about transferring the money to a Harrier or Tornado project ?
They said that last time.thorny1a wrote:Once she's gone there is no turning back!!
Without the wing mod being done at the end of this season to extend it's fatigue life it really WILL be the end as far as flying goes.ChrisGlobe wrote:They said that last time.thorny1a wrote:Once she's gone there is no turning back!!
To costly to run. Put it in a museum now, and use outstanding funds to build a hangar for it. Manchester has shown the way with Concorde hangar.thorny1a wrote:I respectfully disagree with the original post in the strongest terms. To say that the public "don't give a monkeys" is utterly ludicrous. Without the generosity of the public, thousands of whom have put their hand in their pockets time & again for this angel of the skies, she would not have got off the ground in the first place!!
We should in my opinion continue to try & keep XH558 in the air for as long as possible. Once she's gone there is no turning back!!
Vulcan howl forever!
Matt
It is costly to run and the main problem with your suggestion is that there are no immediate funds, as the funds come in they are being spent on the service ready for this season and if they stopped now there would be 2 issues:mhm wrote: To costly to run. Put it in a museum now, and use outstanding funds to build a hangar for it. Manchester has shown the way with Concorde hangar.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests