Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

Notam 31st August

Please post movements and activities to do with RAF Fairford here
User avatar
sschofield
Posts: 1723
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:06 pm
Location: Macclesfield, Cheshire

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by sschofield » Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:05 am

Ah, that makes sense then!

Supra
Posts: 2873
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by Supra » Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:44 am

That's all to logical for me! How about this?... For just one moment the USAF thought they could pull the wool over the eyes of the fantastic guys posting information on here, by cunningly disguising the U2 movements as a tanker? :roll:
That'll be '11 out of 10' for a :ninja: Fail then?

page_verify
Posts: 1640
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by page_verify » Thu Aug 31, 2017 10:01 am

Supra, The U-2 guys (and broader USAF) know everything that gets posted about them on here so if they're trying to fool anyone by using the Quid call sign then it's not someone here...

Supra
Posts: 2873
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by Supra » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:58 pm

Absolutely! as acknowledged in the post above yours. Sorry, I forgot the final 'wink/whistle' for tongue-in-cheekiness :blush:

Timmo
Posts: 517
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:12 pm

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by Timmo » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:55 pm

B-1s arrived as a fairly tight two-ship and landed around 15:50 local.

User avatar
BOLLO
Posts: 103146
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Nottingham/Mildenhall.

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by BOLLO » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:21 pm

http://www.airfighters.com/photosearch.php?phgid=SHED" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; LOADES
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... _entry=140+" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at last

What do cry when we see The Man With the Stick???

Timmo
Posts: 517
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:12 pm

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by Timmo » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:25 pm

U-2 in the circuit at 16:23 local

User avatar
saint1
Posts: 835
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:04 pm
Location: Jct17, Wilts

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by saint1 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:04 pm

U2 landed and back in hangar already. Approx 8 hr 30 min flight.

User avatar
sabrejet
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:34 am

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by sabrejet » Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:49 pm

Please gents: we've already had the mods on about the "U2" jokes, and it won't be long before someone else joins in with the coat hangar routine. So please - it's "U-2" (with a hyphen) and "hangar" (with two 'a's').

Unless you are after all talking about Bono's wardrobe, in which case this isn't the correct forum.

Perfick. :)

User avatar
saint1
Posts: 835
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:04 pm
Location: Jct17, Wilts

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by saint1 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:11 pm

sabrejet wrote:Please gents: we've already had the mods on about the "U2" jokes, and it won't be long before someone else joins in with the coat hangar routine. So please - it's "U-2" (with a hyphen) and "hangar" (with two 'a's').

Unless you are after all talking about Bono's wardrobe, in which case this isn't the correct forum.

Perfick. :)
Thanks for the added value, just giving some info from Fairford earlier. By the way, perfick is spelt perfect, unless you are talking about Only Fools and Horses or the Darling Buds of May, in which case this isn't the correct forum...!!

graham luxton

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by graham luxton » Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:18 pm

EGVP wrote:
sschofield wrote:Anyone know why the U-2 is using a "Quid" callsign which is normally assigned to Mildenhall-based tankers? Just curious really!
QUID was originally a callsign used by 9th SRW KC-135Qs when deployed in support of SR-71 missions, which then became a permanent detachment, and eventually the 100th ARW.

In theory, both 100ARW and 9RW have 'dibs' on the callsign!
From my recollection it wasn't like that. The first time I remember SR's A/Ring with Quid's was during Operation El Dorado Canyon in 1986. When SR-71 ops began at Mildenhall their KC-135Q's were assigned to the 100ARW at Beale, 6 and sometimes 7 of which were detached at the 'Hall in support. Tanker c/s were changed for every mission the SR flew ( why make it easy for the other side) and when the Q's were re-assigned to the 9 SRW in '83 that continued. For example, on 26 Jan'85 the SR flew as "Owl" but its Q's flew as "Jig". On 28 Mar'85 the SR was "Ardic" and its Q's were "Union".

page_verify
Posts: 1640
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by page_verify » Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:53 pm

The big difference now is that they want t'other side to know they're coming.

User avatar
Knife 04
Posts: 3469
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: 'Up the smoke doin' a deal'

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by Knife 04 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 10:01 pm

graham luxton wrote:
EGVP wrote:
sschofield wrote:Anyone know why the U-2 is using a "Quid" callsign which is normally assigned to Mildenhall-based tankers? Just curious really!
QUID was originally a callsign used by 9th SRW KC-135Qs when deployed in support of SR-71 missions, which then became a permanent detachment, and eventually the 100th ARW.

In theory, both 100ARW and 9RW have 'dibs' on the callsign!
From my recollection it wasn't like that. The first time I remember SR's A/Ring with Quid's was during Operation El Dorado Canyon in 1986. When SR-71 ops began at Mildenhall their KC-135Q's were assigned to the 100ARW at Beale, 6 and sometimes 7 of which were detached at the 'Hall in support. Tanker c/s were changed for every mission the SR flew ( why make it easy for the other side) and when the Q's were re-assigned to the 9 SRW in '83 that continued. For example, on 26 Jan'85 the SR flew as "Owl" but its Q's flew as "Jig". On 28 Mar'85 the SR was "Ardic" and its Q's were "Union".
OK - books out time (prior to the net) - from Mike Vine's and David Davies Superbase 5 book 'Mildenhall' they have 17971 flying as 'Quid 76' and Ops Director 'Quid 54' operating from the tower for an SR mission with the Commander of Det 4 operating mobile as 'Quid 73'. From the book it is unclear whether these are from the same mission although it does appear that the SRs did operate with the callsign 'Quid' (unless I am more naive than I thought and it is for the book only) - possibility that it is a historical 9th SRW (RW) callsign??

Book is well after Mr Luxton's recollection anyway with El Dorado Canyon being 1986 and the book published in 1989

Darren

User avatar
R1nger
Posts: 967
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:44 pm
Location: Central England

Re: Notam 31st August

Post by R1nger » Fri Sep 01, 2017 9:06 am

So Quid was a Beale callsign that the 100 ARW kept when they re-located to the 'hall.
George

Remember that sorry is the hardest word - unless you're Chinese, then it's squirrel

Post Reply

Return to “RAF Fairford”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests