Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
SJ at the heath
Re: SJ at the heath
Wow thanks slogan51 didnt realise that something else I've learned thankyou for your help
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 3:53 pm
Re: SJ at the heath
Thanks Raptor22 and Slogen51 for your comments, much appreciated. Think I'll try to visit this week, so hopefully they'll stay long enough!
- roughcutter
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:47 pm
- Location: Widnes, Cheshire
Re: SJ at the heath
Has there been any further information as to when the SJ's will be returning to the US? I have seen January mentioned already but nothing further. I'm hoping to have a few days at Lakenheath after Christmas, Cheers.
Re: SJ at the heath
Like roughcutter... could I ask the same question? ... Is there any further info on the SJs departure from Lakenheath to the US.
I notice a KC46 from Seymour Johnson as gone into Prestwick today... would this be in preparation for the F15s departure from the Lakenheath?
Any help would be very much appreciated.
MTIA
T1
I notice a KC46 from Seymour Johnson as gone into Prestwick today... would this be in preparation for the F15s departure from the Lakenheath?
Any help would be very much appreciated.
MTIA
T1
Re: SJ at the heath
The SJ KC46 and a Beale 135 have been AAR training with each other from PIK on Sat & Sun, both arrived on Friday & rumoured to be here for 3-4 days, other than that is anybody’s guess.
Re: SJ at the heath
Would it make sense for the tankers from the next F-35A delivery into Lakenheath take the SJ back home ?
Re: SJ at the heath
Given the unusual pattern of this deployment, I suspect there is more to it than we know/realise. Perhaps they're here as cover for whilst the 493rd draw down and the 495th work up. That way there remain 3 active squadrons at LN whilst the changeovers occur. If that's correct then they'll be here till the 495th are declared operational.
I realise having said that they'll depart for home tomorrow
I realise having said that they'll depart for home tomorrow
Re: SJ at the heath
My thoughts..... I'm not sure you'd have a predominantly strike and ground attack aircraft provide any kind of cover for an air superiority type (E vs C). The 493 do not provide any sort of defence day to day via QRA etc. to the UK so there's not a role as such there to replace. If there was a need for the USAF to maintain a European based air defence type volume then, as we saw during type changes in the old war, I'd imagine an AFR or ANG F15 or F16 squadron would deploy and provide those numbers......Malcolm wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:40 pmGiven the unusual pattern of this deployment, I suspect there is more to it than we know/realise. Perhaps they're here as cover for whilst the 493rd draw down and the 495th work up. That way there remain 3 active squadrons at LN whilst the changeovers occur. If that's correct then they'll be here till the 495th are declared operational.
I realise having said that they'll depart for home tomorrow
Re: SJ at the heath
Purely conjecture on my part, but once the 493rd F15C's are removed then there won't be any dedicated USAF air superiority in Europe anyway. F-35 is similar to F-15E in it's role. F-15E can do air superiority - although agree that's not it's normal role. I just wonder if there is a requirement for USAFE to have a declared number of operational squadrons available to NATO. Putting F-15E into a base that already operates the type simplifies support until the F-35 squadron is up to speed, and allows any F-15C specific equipment to be withdrawn.Agent K wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:22 pmMy thoughts..... I'm not sure you'd have a predominantly strike and ground attack aircraft provide any kind of cover for an air superiority type (E vs C). The 493 do not provide any sort of defence day to day via QRA etc. to the UK so there's not a role as such there to replace. If there was a need for the USAF to maintain a European based air defence type volume then, as we saw during type changes in the old war, I'd imagine an AFR or ANG F15 or F16 squadron would deploy and provide those numbers......Malcolm wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:40 pmGiven the unusual pattern of this deployment, I suspect there is more to it than we know/realise. Perhaps they're here as cover for whilst the 493rd draw down and the 495th work up. That way there remain 3 active squadrons at LN whilst the changeovers occur. If that's correct then they'll be here till the 495th are declared operational.
I realise having said that they'll depart for home tomorrow
As I say, speculation, but if they stick around till the 495th are declared operational and then go home it'll be fairly convincing to me.
Re: SJ at the heath
Thanks for your thoughts and info guys.. Its very much appreciated...let's hope they stay around for another couple of weeks or so.
T1
T1
Re: SJ at the heath
Maybe they are sticking around while Russia is still building up its forces on the Ukraine border, save them going home then coming back again soon if it all escalates.
Re: SJ at the heath
Agreed Malcolm, yes, I alluded to maintaining declared numbers there, although via alternate means. Whatever the reason, it was nice to spend a day at the fence yesterday and see different F15E's and also the SJ crews wearing yellow bonedomes.Malcolm wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:52 pm
Purely conjecture on my part, but once the 493rd F15C's are removed then there won't be any dedicated USAF air superiority in Europe anyway. F-35 is similar to F-15E in it's role. F-15E can do air superiority - although agree that's not it's normal role. I just wonder if there is a requirement for USAFE to have a declared number of operational squadrons available to NATO. Putting F-15E into a base that already operates the type simplifies support until the F-35 squadron is up to speed, and allows any F-15C specific equipment to be withdrawn.
As I say, speculation, but if they stick around till the 495th are declared operational and then go home it'll be fairly convincing to me.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Warren and 10 guests