Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
Tue 10th may
Tue 10th may
C-37 01-0076 showing pinging on the ground as VALOR76 at 1134L
Re: Tue 10th may
ADSB has Merlin ZH860 showing halfway between Prestwick & Arran, with departure point showing as Prestwick, at 1510L. No callsign showing.
Re: Tue 10th may
c5 still in
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:09 pm
Re: Tue 10th may
No other C5 has been in since you’re correct. Perhaps if you never blocked a lot of people on Facebook like myself Colin for correcting you then you’d have the information as it is posted on groups111blackmike wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:07 pmThe C5 left Monday morning at 2am or something close to that time. Unless another came in and hasn’t been reported.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 11:01 am
- Location: West Scotland
Re: Tue 10th may
Believe she may be assigned to HMS Portland, was doing training work with HMS Tracker in the clyde yesterday evening before heading down and landing in the middle of the channel (on Portland)
Re: Tue 10th may
Can I just say that I myself was uncertain whether the C5 was still in due to the lack of notice of its departure. I believe it might only have been the day after (?) it was logged and amongst other aircraft log so wasn't the clearest.JHolden92 wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:15 pmNo other C5 has been in since you’re correct. Perhaps if you never blocked a lot of people on Facebook like myself Colin for correcting you then you’d have the information as it is posted on groups111blackmike wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:07 pmThe C5 left Monday morning at 2am or something close to that time. Unless another came in and hasn’t been reported.
Re: Tue 10th may
It departed at 01.57 on Monday morning, did any of you think about checking the Reach section? :- viewtopic.php?f=113&t=219475voodoo12 wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:37 pmCan I just say that I myself was uncertain whether the C5 was still in due to the lack of notice of its departure. I believe it might only have been the day after (?) it was logged and amongst other aircraft log so wasn't the clearest.JHolden92 wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:15 pmNo other C5 has been in since you’re correct. Perhaps if you never blocked a lot of people on Facebook like myself Colin for correcting you then you’d have the information as it is posted on groups111blackmike wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:07 pm
The C5 left Monday morning at 2am or something close to that time. Unless another came in and hasn’t been reported.
Re: Tue 10th may
rch 747 over me in clackmanin c17 inbound
Re: Tue 10th may
The 1.55am departure of the C-5M was well documented on SAP venom
Scottish Aviation Photographers (SAP) - Facebook
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:09 pm
Re: Tue 10th may
Why check yourself when you can just get other to do it for you haha. Seems to be the normal thing now sadly.Mike wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:44 pm
It departed at 01.57 on Monday morning, did any of you think about checking the Reach section? :- viewtopic.php?f=113&t=219475
Re: Tue 10th may
Too many want spoon fed nowadays MikeMike wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:44 pmIt departed at 01.57 on Monday morning, did any of you think about checking the Reach section? :- viewtopic.php?f=113&t=219475
Cheers Niall
Nikon D7200
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8
Nikon 300mm f2.8
Nikon 18-140mm
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/59398793@N03/
Nikon D7200
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8
Nikon 300mm f2.8
Nikon 18-140mm
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/59398793@N03/
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:09 pm
Re: Tue 10th may
Another problem that’s seems to be the normal thing nowadays is people act like they done nothing wrong when posting the wrong information rather than accepting that they caught it wrong and apologising. As for an example if someone seen that the C5 was still in then the might have traveled down to see it to only find out that it was already left the day before. That’s them just wasted time, money and fuel for something that could have easily been avoided.np1991 wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 12:54 pmToo many want spoon fed nowadays MikeMike wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:44 pmIt departed at 01.57 on Monday morning, did any of you think about checking the Reach section? :- viewtopic.php?f=113&t=219475
Re: Tue 10th may
Exactly right.111blackmike wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 5:01 pmAnother problem that’s seems to be the normal thing nowadays is people act like they done nothing wrong when posting the wrong information rather than accepting that they caught it wrong and apologising. As for an example if someone seen that the C5 was still in then the might have travelled down to see it to only find out that it was already left the day before. That’s them just wasted time, money and fuel for something that could have easily been avoided.
venom's post above says
, which was absolute nonsense when he posted it. I presume his ridiculously lazy way of posting was meant to say 'Is the C-5 still in?'.c5 still in
There is a huge amount of difference between the meanings of 'c5 still in' and 'Is the C-5 still in?' but nothing is ever done about what he posts, sadly.
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:09 pm
Re: Tue 10th may
It’s a shame that the hobby has some people that don’t think that there actions in posting duff info may cause confusion and also waste people time. Then act like are the victim because you are apparently trolling them or picking on them when you try and correct them.Mike wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 5:16 pmExactly right.111blackmike wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 5:01 pmAnother problem that’s seems to be the normal thing nowadays is people act like they done nothing wrong when posting the wrong information rather than accepting that they caught it wrong and apologising. As for an example if someone seen that the C5 was still in then the might have travelled down to see it to only find out that it was already left the day before. That’s them just wasted time, money and fuel for something that could have easily been avoided.
venom's post above says, which was absolute nonsense when he posted it. I presume his ridiculously lazy way of posting was meant to say 'Is the C-5 still in?'.c5 still in
There is a huge amount of difference between the meanings of 'c5 still in' and 'Is the C-5 still in?' but nothing is ever done about what he posts, sadly.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Contrail1958, MichaelC99 and 26 guests