Not a bad idea, it might result in less potholes along our roads.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_battalion

Do they really think that will win them votesStevenNFFC wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 10:12 pmConservatives plan to bring back mandatory National Service
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpddxy9r4mdo
Well this should put the cat amongst the pigeons!The Conservative Party has said it would bring back mandatory national service if it wins the general election.
It said 18-year-olds would have a choice of either joining the military full-time, or volunteering one weekend every month carrying out a community service.
The party is proposing a Royal Commission to consider the details but would plan for the first teenagers to take part in September 2025.
The cost is expected to be around £2.5bn per year.
Under the plans, young people could choose a full-time, 12-month placement in the armed forces or UK cyber defence, learning about logistics, cyber security, procurement or civil response operations.
Their other option would be to volunteer one weekend per month - or 25 days per year - in their community with organisations such as fire, police and the NHS.
yes Starmer's wing man the one been investigated over a house issueJames Cutting wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 1:49 pmAbsolutely spot on and well said. People still blame Labour for the state we're in, ignoring the last FOURTEEN (14) years of Tory 'power' making things worse.
My opinion is it's time for change. Whoever it is, it needs to be changed. Just because Starmer leads Labour, that can still change down the line.
Q. What's funny or should make you smile about the death of someone, whatever their politics.
The irony of a demographic swinging the vote on a topic they were never going to have to live through the repercussions of, and if taken today would be the opposite answer is absolutely hilarious to me....
[You can join a political party at 16, but can't vote for them. You can join armed forces at 16 but not have a say in how the country is run
atech wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2024 5:31 pm[You can join a political party at 16, but can't vote for them. You can join armed forces at 16 but not have a say in how the country is run
Just because you can do something in Scotland and Wales doesn’t make it a good litmus test for doing the same in England. The politicians that made those decisions did so more for their own interests (more votes) rather than any interest in increasing democracy.
Yes you can join the armed forces at 16 but you cannot serve overseas or in any combat zone until you reach the age of 18, at which point you re-attest and your term of service officially starts.
You cannot drive at 16, you cannot drink alcohol, smoke, have sex, marry without consent, sign legal documents, if you commit a crime, your case is dealt with by the juvenile authorities, and so on.
It used to be called the age of consent and which used to be 21, the age at which you were considered adult enough to be responsible for your own actions.
We have already lowered it once to 18, I see no evidence to suggest that it needs to be lowered again.
Why don't they make a good test? Is England above Scotland and Wales?atech wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2024 5:31 pm[You can join a political party at 16, but can't vote for them. You can join armed forces at 16 but not have a say in how the country is run
Just because you can do something in Scotland and Wales doesn’t make it a good litmus test for doing the same in England. The politicians that made those decisions did so more for their own interests (more votes) rather than any interest in increasing democracy.
Thank you for confirmingYes you can join the armed forces at 16....
These are very England oriented generalisations, some are actually untrue across the UK and some untrue in different parts of the UK. Tried as adult is also a thing.You cannot drive at 16, you cannot drink alcohol, smoke, have sex, marry without consent, sign legal documents, if you commit a crime, your case is dealt with by the juvenile authorities, and so on.
I don't see why not, it's the lowest voting demographic anyway, only people I have seen get techy about it is the grey hair brigade.It used to be called the age of consent and which used to be 21, the age at which you were considered adult enough to be responsible for your own actions.
We have already lowered it once to 18, I see no evidence to suggest that it needs to be lowered again.
I don't know about the Tories in general, but Sunak seems to be doing his best to purposely get kicked out of office, like he doesn't want the job anymore.
Users browsing this forum: seven and 31 guests