Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

RAF to get another 16x chinooks

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
Phoon
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:50 pm

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Phoon » Mon Oct 22, 2018 2:06 pm

Goodbye RAF Benson then.....

All Chinooks will be concentrated at Odiham most likely.

User avatar
TonyO
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Laandaaan, UK
Contact:

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by TonyO » Mon Oct 22, 2018 4:02 pm

No new airframes in Puma upgrade, just refurbishment, new engines and avionics. No evidence to suggest that the new Wokkas will replace the Pumas...or should that be Pumps?
You want the Aladeen news, or the Aladeen news?

POL
Posts: 16971
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by POL » Mon Oct 22, 2018 4:07 pm

I thought Puma made trainers? Or sneakers, if you must..?

User avatar
TonyO
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Laandaaan, UK
Contact:

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by TonyO » Mon Oct 22, 2018 6:02 pm

EGVP wrote:
Mon Oct 22, 2018 4:07 pm
I thought Puma made trainers? Or sneakers, if you must..?
But did Puma make Pumps, like these?

Image

Did you ever have to wear these Chris?
You want the Aladeen news, or the Aladeen news?

User avatar
Agent K
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Agent K » Tue Oct 23, 2018 11:35 am

Surely the Puma and Chinook fulfil different requirements, the Puma more versatile for inner city and constricted work (often special forces), and a Chinook can't replace a Puma without losing this capability?

Re use of English, I've never quite understood why we can't all aspire to a common language with a good level of correct spelling and grammar, and check what we post. It's not too much to ask, surely?

User avatar
TonyO
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Laandaaan, UK
Contact:

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by TonyO » Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:40 am

Phoon wrote:
Mon Oct 22, 2018 2:06 pm
Goodbye RAF Benson then.....

All Chinooks will be concentrated at Odiham most likely.
But there are now Chinooks at Benson because they have run out of room at Odiham.
You want the Aladeen news, or the Aladeen news?

User avatar
PeteHemsley
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: mobile UK
Contact:

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by PeteHemsley » Wed Oct 24, 2018 10:16 am

TonyO wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:40 am
Phoon wrote:
Mon Oct 22, 2018 2:06 pm
Goodbye RAF Benson then.....

All Chinooks will be concentrated at Odiham most likely.
But there are now Chinooks at Benson because they have run out of room at Odiham.
Are you certain about that? I'm sure the RAF released that Chinooks were to move to Benson in the long run to keep all DHC at one station?

User avatar
TonyO
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Laandaaan, UK
Contact:

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by TonyO » Wed Oct 24, 2018 10:23 am

From the RAF Benson website - https://www.raf.mod.uk/our-organisation ... af-benson/
RAF Benson in South Oxfordshire is a support helicopter main operating base working within the Joint Helicopter Command.

RAF Benson is home to two front-line Puma HC2 helicopter squadrons, and one Operational Conversion Unit, flying a mix of Puma HC2 and Chinook HC4 helicopters.

RAF Benson is also home to the civilian National Police Air Service and the Thames Valley Air Ambulance which operate 24 hours a day.
You want the Aladeen news, or the Aladeen news?

User avatar
Agent K
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Agent K » Wed Oct 24, 2018 10:53 am

PeteHemsley wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 10:16 am
TonyO wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:40 am
Phoon wrote:
Mon Oct 22, 2018 2:06 pm
Goodbye RAF Benson then.....

All Chinooks will be concentrated at Odiham most likely.
But there are now Chinooks at Benson because they have run out of room at Odiham.
Are you certain about that? I'm sure the RAF released that Chinooks were to move to Benson in the long run to keep all DHC at one station?
It's a fairly recent move due to congested airspace at Odiham not compatable for initial/conversion training and operational requirements. I've seen nothing afterwards about an expensive and backwards relocate?

Motley
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 7:25 pm

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Motley » Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:47 pm

That would be 28 Sqn at Benson, joint Chinook and Puma OCU

Davef68
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:54 am

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Davef68 » Thu Oct 25, 2018 8:59 am

From memory, the RAF want to maintain a mix of support types beyond the Puma 2025 OSD. What is likely to replace the Puma post OSD is interesting - AW149 might be one option, or what the US decides as it's UH60 replacement

Phoon
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:50 pm

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Phoon » Thu Oct 25, 2018 3:22 pm

Agent K wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 10:53 am
PeteHemsley wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 10:16 am
TonyO wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 9:40 am


But there are now Chinooks at Benson because they have run out of room at Odiham.
Are you certain about that? I'm sure the RAF released that Chinooks were to move to Benson in the long run to keep all DHC at one station?
It's a fairly recent move due to congested airspace at Odiham not compatable for initial/conversion training and operational requirements. I've seen nothing afterwards about an expensive and backwards relocate?
Joint Helicopter Command operates from 6 MOB - RNAS Culdrose, RNAS Yeovilton, AAC Wattisham, AAC Middle Wallop, RAF Benson and RAF Odiham, along with detachments at Aldergrove in the UK. These airfields represent a significant chunk of the current Defence Estates active airfields. The plan of JHC was to combine assets and organisation, operating from this many airfields in the current defence climate is simply unsustainable. I'd expect inside the next ten years these establishments to have been halved or two closed as an absolute minimum.

User avatar
TonyO
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Laandaaan, UK
Contact:

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by TonyO » Thu Oct 25, 2018 6:57 pm

There is talk of transferring the Apache community to Boscombe Down, and closing Wattisham, focusing much of the helicopter fleet around the South of England.

Which JHC helicopters operate from Culdrose?
You want the Aladeen news, or the Aladeen news?

MRTT
Posts: 6545
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by MRTT » Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:29 pm

None, as far as I'm aware.

User avatar
Agent K
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Agent K » Thu Oct 25, 2018 9:08 pm

None.

User avatar
bizfreeq
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:08 pm
Location: Bournemouth UK

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by bizfreeq » Fri Oct 26, 2018 9:52 am

RN fleet helicopters don't come under JHC so nothing from JHC is based at Culdrose
Cheers
Mark



If our airforces are never used, they have achieved their finest goal.
— General Nathan F. Twining

User avatar
Agent K
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Agent K » Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:42 am

Are RN Wildcat part of JHC?

Phoon
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:50 pm

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Phoon » Fri Oct 26, 2018 11:02 am

My Mistake - only the Yeovilton Merlins come under JHC - It still means we have to many airfields for service helicopter basing though.

User avatar
Agent K
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by Agent K » Fri Oct 26, 2018 1:16 pm

Given that Benson, I believe houses the simulators, controllers and logistics aspects of the Chinook operations then if as you suggest one of the bases were to close might it not be Benson?

Pure idle speculation however, and given the fact that:

- more Chinooks aren't a Puma replacement and that I believe the army requirement/aspiration is for a medium lift Puma/NH90 type equivalent for the replacment type,
- the need that sent the OCU to Benson in the first place will not have changed,

then maybe things will stay as is?
-

User avatar
bizfreeq
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:08 pm
Location: Bournemouth UK

Re: RAF to get another 16x chinooks

Post by bizfreeq » Fri Oct 26, 2018 1:17 pm

Agent K wrote:
Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:42 am
Are RN Wildcat part of JHC?
847NAS are as far as I'm aware
Cheers
Mark



If our airforces are never used, they have achieved their finest goal.
— General Nathan F. Twining

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DanSeaman, Durranhill, Johnny, Sprague and 169 guests