Doubt it. I know 3 people that have received the letter and they've all said - errr - "No thanks", but in trucker-ese it's pronounced F*$k Off.

Have you any results you can share on using a tank or two of E5/99 yet? It only took you about three weeks of E10/95 to note the poorer mpg compared to the previous E5/95.
Initial claim was based two very adjacent long runs on E10/95 (approx 900 miles each). Have now indeed filled with E5/99 - cost 6p/l more at my Tesco - but circumstances have meant I have only really done some pottering since so no real figures yet. However in a few weeks am due to repeat a long run (will be two tanks worth) so am hoping to get a definitive answer then.roger4 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 11, 2021 4:57 pmHave you any results you can share on using a tank or two of E5/99 yet? It only took you about three weeks of E10/95 to note the poorer mpg compared to the previous E5/95.
I am increasingly suspicious that the forecourt shortages may have been caused by the switch E5/95 to E10/95, as I don't believe in coincidence. Presumably if many cars are experiencing perhaps 10% poorer mpg, compared to the previous old E5/95, the average driver would have to fill up 10% more often leading to 10% more demand for fuel. That's all it would take for a few garages to run low/out of unleaded. And as soon as the press tell us of fuel shortages, we all (diesel owners included) panic!
Or am I being too cynical?
they did a comparison on TV on Fifth Gear tells you all you need to know!? i wont be using it in my vehicles
Users browsing this forum: iainpeden, Mike@Heathrow and 23 guests